Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Search in comments
Search in excerpt
Search in posts
Search in pages
Search in groups
Search in users
Search in forums
Filter by Categories
All Blogs
Antidote
Dick of the Week!
Entertainment & Celebs
Featured
Headline
In The News
PYWSIH
The Moron's of Judge Judy
Video
World
My Apple Has a Worm!

Lets face it, we all love Apple’s overpriced iToys. The feeling when you can finally prove to the world that ‘yes I am trendy – see I have proof’. It doesn’t matter the fact that their strict secrecy policies are beating their workers in China to the point of suicide, all is forgiven when you hear the soft ‘whoosh’ when you first open the box, the first touch of the crisp lines and first caress of its femine curves, and the first interaction with the intuitive UI. So luscious indeed!

My question is though, when did Apple suddenly become the benchmark of all things trendy in tech? When did this half eaten fruit gain its godly status? When did I fall asleep clutching my flag shaped Window only to wake up hungry for a bite of an Apple? Whatever the reason, there is definitely a trance inducing allure that falls on anyone unlucky enough to fall under its heavenly light, and I must say that I am finding it hard to resist.

The thing that is starting to annoy me most is not so much of the choices of computers out there that I should buy to fill that space on my desk. What really annoys me is that I have already made up my mind to buy an Apple Computer without really knowing why. I am finding that I am trying to convince myself that there are better options out there that are a lot cheaper and run a lot faster, but yet I am dumbly drawn back to where I was. It’s like trying to convince a homing pidgeon to go on a holiday, y’know somewhere sunny by the beach or something, only to find that he has flown back home again! ARGH!

I know Apple are evil, I know that their products are overpriced, I know that their fanboyz run around with their empty brainless smiles trying to convince you that their new found life is so much better than yours. So what should I do? Should I take a bite of this forbidden fruit? Are all things Apple so much better in iLand? Or is it just filled with empty promises of sunshine, lollypops and rainbows. Or then again, am I putting too much emotional energy into this, as well let’s face it, it’s only a bloody computer!

Dick of the Week! – Arnold Schwarzenegger

I was reading in the paper this week how Arnold Schwarzenegger shortened sentence given to Esteban Nunez for the manslaughter of fellow student Luis Dos Santos.

Schwarzenegger cut 7 years of the original 16 year sentence saying that the original term was ‘excessive and disproportionate.”

The victim’s mother Cathy Santos, who was informed of the decision by journalists, said: “I think it’s absolutely despicable. I think it’s a huge injustice to our son. The courts don’t mean a thing. It sends out the message that backdoor deals are fine.”

The reason why I am ‘awarding’ Schwarzenegger the ‘Dick of the Week’ is he obviously doing this as a favour for his ‘bed buddy’ Fabian Nunez a Democrat, who was Speaker of the lower house of California’s state legislature from 2004 to 2008 and worked closely with Mr Schwarzenegger, a Republican, in passing landmark environmental legislation.

Firstly why in America can a politician cut sentences? Surely this is a conflict of interest which is completely highlighted here. Not only that, they are not policemen, judges, criminal psychologists and so therefore, like the most of us, have really no idea when it comes to crime and punishment. So how on earth can their opinion, and it is only an opinion, be enough to overrule a sentence handed down by the judge and having gone through all the legal processes before reaching that decision? It is completely mind boggling and undermines the whole legal process in the US.

Secondly, Schwarzenegger cut the sentence on the last day of being the Governor of California – what a legacy!! He spent most of his life flighting the bad guys and then the last thing he does in the public eye is this?

Arnold – you are pathetic and so are now labelled ‘The Dick of the Week’.

What a Moron! – Morgan Elderfield

Morgan Elderfield – “F… off, pig, I’m a lawyer. I got 94 in my UAI and I’m sorry you are so inferior and don’t know the law”.

What a tool! What a complete spanner!!

Oh yes! I am feeling the warm embrace of justice well served after reading an article in the Sydney Morning Hearld of Australia which tells of a young arrogant yobbo being charged after a ‘booze-fuelled outburst’ at an Australian pub.

The drunk belligerent law student was asked to leave the Wollongong Hotel and reacted by throwing a beer over a security guard then refused to leave by sitting on the floor in a huff like a petulant child.

Eventually another security guard was involved by grabbing her by the wrists in an attempt to remove her from the premises.

After removing her from hotel she continued, in her lady-like manner, to hurl abuse but this time at the police.

After repeated warnings to calm down and go home she was arrested after giving the officers ‘the birdy’ when trying to enter a taxi stomach first.

Throughout the arrest Elderfield continued to thrash about and abuse the officers, scratching one of them and drawing blood.

In court her friends alleged that the security guards and police where extreme in their handling of the situation.

However the magistrate, Ian Guy, found that there were no substance to their claim and dismissed them by saying that they were “unconvincing in the extreme”.

Elderfield was found guilty of six charges, including assaulting police, behaving in an offensive manner in public and failing to leave licensed premises.

She was then fined a total of $2000 and placed on four 12-month good behaviour bond.

Brilliant!!

What I know about Morgan Elderfield
Full Name Morgan Elderfield
Facebook www.facebook.com/people/Morgan-Elderfield
Lives Osborne St, Wollongong, Australia
Sophie Powles – Emmerdale – She Can’t Even Act as a Spaced Out Druggie!

Ok, maybe I am giving too much away about my past-time activities – but I do like watching Emmerdale. I was hooked after my English girlfriend insisted turning it on during dinner. Sigh – is there any hope for me?

So that said, I am quite passionately impressed with the casting of this show and the high level of acting abilities the cast has. For example, look at the actor Danny Miller who plays Aaron Livesy – fantastic from the word go! I mean most new and virtually inexperienced actors tend to need a while to ‘form’ into their character, whereas Danny was perfect from day one. Completely brilliant!

So my question is – what the hell were they on when they selected Sophie Powles to play Holly Barton? This monotone expressionless bint is so painful to watch!

Watch the video above and I’m sure you will agree! (You will have to fast forward 10 seconds!)

Sophie Powles is a Yip Yip

Urgh! See – how painful was that?! Torture even! That part when they were checking out Nathan – (0:53) – so bad!!!! She didn’t even look at him, just spun her head back and forth! I was surprised that she didn’t turn around and go ‘Yip yip yip yip’ like the Yip Yip’s from Sesame Street! (Don’t know the Yip Yip’s? Click here. Very funny!)

Maybe I am thinking about it too much but it just annoys me that much! At the moment her role is changing from a ‘sweet’ farming girl to an edgy drug addict which really should be relatively easy to act. I mean either you’re stoned and off your face (very easy), or you’re twitchy and paranoid (quite easy) – even I could do that! But she can’t! I’m sure the producers decided after listening to public opinion about her and thought that she should be able to at least play a druggie – WRONG!!

Please! Emerdale Producers! GET RID OF HER!!! SHE IS USELESS!!!

Anyway, she has run away from the Barton’s house – lets hope it’s for quite a while and she comes back but as a different actor!

One can only hope!

What a Moron! – Alexandra Nelson – Judge Judy – Part 1
Sorry guys, looks like CBS has ordered YouTube to remove the video. I will see if I can find another copy soon.

Alexandra Nelson – another cow trying to manipulate the court system to get her own malicious way.

Nothing gets my blood boiling as much as a wench using the courts against innocent males just because they can. It makes a mockery of the years and years of fighting to get women’s rights heard and respected – it is just sickening!!!

Anyway, Judge Judy rips her another a’hole – brilliant!

To see Part 2 – click here.

What I know about Alexandra Nelson
Full Name Alexandra Nelson
MySpace al3x_n3ls0n
Lives BROKE-TOWN, USA
Spouse Ryan Keller
Stupid Quotes ‘Ne thing else u wanna know dont be shy to ask nd if ur shy dont botha cause thats one thing i cant stand is someone who is shy!”Cause he’s a losjer’
What others are saying televisionwithoutpity.com
What a Moron! – Alexandra Nelson – Judge Judy – Part 2

Sorry guys, looks like CBS has ordered YouTube to remove the video. I will see if I can find another copy soon.

Alexandra Nelson – another cow trying to manipulate the court system to get their own malicious way.

Nothing gets my blood boiling as much as a wench using the courts against innocent males just because they can. It makes a mockery of the years and years of fighting to get women’s rights heard and respected – it is just sickening!!!

Anyway, Judge Judy rips her another a’hole – brilliant!

To see Part 1 – click here.

What I know about Alexandra Nelson
Full Name Alexandra Nelson
MySpace al3x_n3ls0n
Lives BROKE-TOWN, USA
Spouse Ryan Keller
Stupid Quotes ‘Ne thing else u wanna know dont be shy to ask nd if ur shy dont botha cause thats one thing i cant stand is someone who is shy!”Cause he’s a losjer’
What others are saying televisionwithoutpity.com
What a Moron! – Ashley Brawthen – Judge Judy – Part 1

Sorry guys, looks like CBS has ordered YouTube to remove the video. I will see if I can find another copy soon.

Ashley Brawthen – a fine example of a malicious and vindictive biatch.

Brawthen is being sued by the father of her child (Ashley Welsh) for stealing his property and damaging his door. Although the case seems quite trivial on the surface, after Judge Judy digs a little the skeletons come out of the closet.

Brawthen is one evil cow and the world needs to know who this person really is. She was furious that her ex Welsh was seeing another girl and thought that she would get back at him by hitting him where it really hurts – denying him access to his child.

Her plan, even though malicious, was no doubt clever. She organised a restraining order against Welsh on the basis that ‘he physically and verbally abused her’ which automatically get issued as they tend to err on the side of caution. However there was no truth to her claim and it was in fact her that abused him. She also organised an application for full custody of the child. So with the restraining order in her hand the courts should then look favourably on her custody application. Evil bitch! She organized all of this on the day that Welsh was looking after the child and this is when Judge Judy saw right through her claim as who in her right mind would leave their child with a so called ‘abusive person’.

Make sure you watch both videos and I’m 100% sure that you will be filled with the feeling of sweet justice when JJ rips into her!! This woman needs to be shown to the world what an evil bitch she really is!

To part 2 – click here.

What a Moron! – Ashley Brawthen – Judge Judy – Part 2

Sorry guys, looks like CBS has ordered YouTube to remove the video. I will see if I can find another copy soon.

Ashley Brawthen – a fine example of a malicious and vindictive biatch – part 2.

Brawthen is being sued by the father of her child (Ashley Welsh) for stealing his property and damaging his door. Although the case seems quite trivial on the surface, after Judge Judy digs a little the skeletons come out of the closet.

Brawthen is one evil cow and the world needs to know who this person really is. She was furious that her ex Welsh was seeing another girl and thought that she would get back at him by hitting him where it really hurts – denying him access to his child.

Her plan, even though malicious, was no doubt clever. She organised a restraining order against Welsh on the basis that ‘he physically and verbally abused her’ which automatically get issued as they tend to err on the side of caution. However there was no truth to her claim and it was in fact her that abused him. She also organised an application for full custody of the child. So with the restraining order in her hand the courts should then look favourably on her custody application. Evil bitch! She organized all of this on the day that Welsh was looking after the child and this is when Judge Judy saw right through her claim as who in her right mind would leave their child with a so called ‘abusive person’.

Make sure you watch both videos and I’m 100% sure that you will be filled with the feeling of sweet justice when JJ rips into her!! This woman needs to be shown to the world what an evil bitch she really is!

To see part one – click here.

K1dz, itz tym 4 d1na!

What is up with the youth of day? I have a 14 year old daughter that just does not listen to me anymore. Whenever I speak to her I just get that ‘watching tv’ blank star and not so much as a hint of any cognitive action. In fact I find it more effective if I just sent her a TXT message, IM them, or send them a Facebook update. I was under the impression that buying her a phone would be a safe guard in case she needed to contact me directly for any reason, but it has totally back fired – ironically her brain only kicks into gear if I threaten to take the phone off her. The phone bill last month was a whopping $150 so in effect I am paying this huge amount for her indifference which pangs me no end. The other night, and it is not a once off as it has happened many times before, I prepared dinner and walked up to my daughters room, banged on her door and said dinner was ready – no response – did it again – no response. It was only when I sent her a TXT message she came out of her room. I also tried updating her Facebook and her friends just egged her on and made a joke about it. Believe me it is NO joke! Why has our relationship ended up this way? When did our mother/daughter chats descend into binary?

Katie Price (Jordan) – The Case of One Serious Fame Wh*re

I was looking on the internet for the exact meaning of the phrase ‘Fame Wh*re’ but wasn’t able to find anything precise.

Quack quack Jordan, Quack Quack
Quack Quack Jordan, Quack Quack

From the sound of it it seems quite fitting when talking about Katie Price. In fact using both words independently also works – very handy indeed!

In the past I didn’t mind Katie Price and Peter Andre with their ‘kooky’ antics, and in fact I used to stay up just to watch ‘Katie & Peter: The Next Chapter Stateside’ for a little light hearted giggle. The problem I have now is that after their already heavily publicised break-up Katie just doesn’t seem to go away. It’s like a old school friend whom you never quite new but didn’t mind too much suddenly appearing and wanting to be best friends! Yeah, it was fun when we were 10 but please, life goes on! At the moment she is so embarrassingly desperate to get people to read some trashy mag about her version of the events that led up to their relationship break down that she is reverting to her old tactics of fandangled sleaziness! Can anyone honestly take her seriously when she drapes herself with letters from her supposed fans and with a deep seductive voice to entice the viewer to buy the mag? Can anyone give a fat arse? Jordan, you are being pathetic!

Sigh! That is the reason for my little vent!

I have a list of celebrities that I find nauseously annoying. Well, it’s not an actual list, more of a mental note – I don’t want you to think that I am obsessive. Of course Victoria Beckham and Heather Mills are up the top. Now, I’m sorry to say Katie, you and your perma-tanned face has shot up from an almost insignificant mosquito buzzing annoying to Pat Ferrari from that Sally Raphaël talk show annoying – who is one anusly annoying wench I might add!

Unfortunately, I don’t think that Katie will get the hint that all products have a used-by-date. She may have found it easy to show some silicon cleavage in the past for a bit of coin but like all plastic-wrapped chickens they only have a very short shelf life. Sad? Perhaps, but this chick is destined for the bin and lets all hope for the sake of our sanity it is sooner than later!

Sheesh!

Kim Yoo-Suk

Poor guy was winning before the crowd started chanting his name!

Poor guy was winning before the crowd started chanting his name!

Bad Voices, Bad Arrangements, Bad Harmonies, Bad Lashes

Here we go again. Four desperate girls who obviously took to heart when their tonedeaf grandmothers told them that they have such amazing voices, are trying to create the next girl group sensation! The groups name? Bad Lashes. Urgh!

To give you a bit of a background.

Bad Lashes were a contestant on Britain’s X Factor 2008 and sung an acappella version of Crazy by Gnarls Barkley for their initial audition. Although completely murdering this great song by over ambitious and badly arranged harmonies they made it through with 1 No and 2 Yes’s.

Throughout X Factor’s filtering process it continued to be apparent that these ‘Hairdressers Trying to be a Girlband’ were completely out of their depth and was very painful to watch – like an uncle making rude jokes at a christening. They have no understanding about creating anticipation with their harmonies and was as though each one of them were competing on being the loudest with their vocal masturbation.

I shouldn’t say that they have bad voices as I’m sure that with some coaching that they one day may sound ok. But for the moment I suggest that they keep quiet, get some lessons, change their name and apply for a job singing old classics at the local old people’s home.

Killers of Baby P – Tracey Connelly and Steven Barker
If you are unfortunate enough to be rejected at the Pearly Gates, then for sure you will bump into these 2 animals – Tracey Connelly and Steven Barker.
For months the courts have banned any publication to reveal their identity until just recently when finally the courts lifted the ban and we can now see who these people are – and their crime? Torturing Connelly’s baby Peter to death!
It’s hard to fathom how anyone can perform these vile acts on a child and we can all agree that it is against the nurturing instincts most normal humans are born with. But month after month, baby Peter was living out his short, 17mth, life being beating, thrown, tortured by Steven Barker, Connelly’s boyfriend, and Connelly sitting idly by allowing this to happen. At the time of his death, baby Peter had 50 injuries including a broken back and eight broken ribs.
It can be somewhat understandable that Connelly wasn’t a model citizen having been fathered by a convicted paedophile and raised by her drug addicted mother. Perhaps seeing this obese slob walking in the supermarket isle swearing at her children for taking a Mars bar could almost be expected. But to allow her boyfriend to beat her son while she watched hardcore porn and chain smoked is to me beyond subhuman. To be so completely detached from a child that she gave birth to, feed, changed diapers etc etc.. and to do nothing? It’s too hard to comprehend! I mean, when she gave birth to baby Peter surely she would have felt some kindly emotions towards him? No? What happened to those motherly feelings?
Steven Barker, convicted of raping a 2 year old girl and a suspect for sexually attacking other children, was brought up by his grandmother who also tortured him throughout his childhood. His upbringing, as disturbing as they were and could be argued that he was fighting some childhood demon, cannot excuse the tortures he performed on this helpless child. What sick pleasure, release, whatever, could he have felt by beating this poor helpless boy to death? And to keep on doing it?
Barker was given a life sentence and Connelly was given a 5 year sentence (but is appealing and could be released in 3 years). Now it may seem a bit unorthodox, but something inside of me wish they were released earlier. Not because I feel sorry for them as they both had horrid upbringings, but because prison is protection. If they were released earlier they will be exposed to the fury of the public and will live their lives in Hell on Earth – just like Baby Peter. That’s what I call justice!

If you are unfortunate enough to be rejected at the Pearly Gates, then for sure you will bump into these 2 animals – Tracey Connelly and Steven Barker.

For months the courts have banned any publication to reveal their identity until just recently when finally the courts lifted the ban and we can now see who these people are – and their crime? Torturing Connelly’s baby Peter to death!

It’s hard to fathom how anyone can perform these vile acts on a child but I am sure we can all agree that it is against the nurturing instincts most normal humans are born with. But month after month baby Peter was living out his short,Tracey Connelly17mth, life being beaten, thrown, tortured by Steven Barker, Connelly’s boyfriend, and Connelly sitting idly by allowing this to happen. At the time of his death, baby Peter had 50 injuries including a broken back and eight broken ribs.

It can be somewhat understandable that Connelly wasn’t a model citizen having been fathered by a convicted paedophile and raised by her drug addicted mother. Perhaps seeing this obese slob walking in the supermarket isle swearing at her children for taking a Mars bar could almost be expected. But to allow her boyfriend to beat her son while she watched hardcore porn and chain smoked is to me beyond subhuman. To be so completely detached from a child that she gave birth to, feed, changed diapers etc etc.. and to do nothing? It’s too hard to comprehend! I mean, when she gave birth to baby Peter surely she would have felt some kindly emotions towards him? No? What happened to those motherly feelings?

Steven_BarkerSteven Barker, convicted of raping a 2 year old girl and a suspect for sexually attacking other children, was brought up by his grandmother who also tortured him throughout his childhood. His upbringing, as disturbing as they were and could be argued that he was fighting some childhood demon, cannot excuse the tortures he performed on this helpless child. What sick pleasure, release, whatever, could he have felt by beating this poor helpless boy to death? And to keep on doing it?

Barker was given a life sentence and Connelly was given a 5 year sentence (but is appealing and could be released in 3 years). Now it may seem a bit unorthodox, but something inside of me wish they were released earlier. Not because I feel sorry for them as they both had horrid upbringings, but because prison is protection. If they were released earlier they will be exposed to the fury of the public and will live their lives in Hell on Earth – just like Baby Peter. That’s what I call real justice!

baby_p

8jm6hr2ynx

What a Moron! – Wendy Moore – Judge Judy

Sorry guys, looks like CBS has ordered YouTube to remove the video. I will see if I can find another copy soon.

Wendy Moore – one sad sack of a woman.

The story goes like this. Derrick Moore, Moore’s son, was listening to music in his mom’s car with his friend Perry-Anne when they decided to take the car for a drive. So they took the car to Perry-Anne’s friend down the road and on the way back they had a terrible car accident and Perry-Anne was killed. She was only 16.

Now a normal mother in that situation would be extremely sorrowful especially as she allowed the children to be in the car with the keys and in fact allows her son to drive the car on her property even though he is not qualified. But instead of this normal reaction she instead decided to sue Perry-Anne’s mother for the cost of the car and for Derrick’s medical expenses!!

Maybe I missed something, perhaps I’m not worldly wise or maybe I’m a little harsh in my thoughts, if so please forgive me when i say that surely this woman is one cold hearted, self centered biatch!! I bet a thought crossed her mind to report the car stolen so she could get an insurance payout but then backtracked as her son was also in the car.

Whatever her reasoning the fact remains that she gave the method for the teenagers to drive the car knowing that she allows her son to drive it and left the keys in the ignition.

Watch the video and let me know what you think!

What I know about Wendy Moore
Full Name Wendy Moore
Job National Guard Administrator
Scientology – Caught Hook, Line and Bank Account

I will start by saying that I have no problems with peoples desire in following a religion, it is up to them and I can understand why as there are a lot of questions about ‘why we are here’, and ‘where did we come from’? The problem I have is when an organization was blantenly created, under the disguis of a religion, to make as much money by taking advantage of peoples insecurities then that just makes my blood boil! This is why I have a strong feeling of hate when it comes to Scientology.

Don’t get me wrong, I don’t think that Scientology is the only one to focus on as there are a lot of other religions that do the same – for example the Christian Church. The difference is that with the Christian Church greed has taken over and has contradicted the core beliefs of the religion that it is trying to represent.

Now getting back to Scientology – the main reason why this organization (it is not a religion as what defines a religion is the belief of a higher being – “Human recognition of superhuman controlling power and especially of a personal God entitled to obedience”), is to make money. This is not just an opinion of an ‘outsider or non-believer’ but was said by the founder himself – L. Ron Hubbard. Here are some of his quotes:

  • “MAKE MONEY. MAKE MORE MONEY. MAKE OTHER PEOPLE PRODUCE SO AS TO MAKE MORE MONEY.” – L. Ron Hubbard, Hubbard Communications Office Policy Letter, 9 March 1972, MS OEC 384
  • “I’d like to start a religion. That’s where the money is.” – L. Ron Hubbard to Lloyd Eshbach, in 1949; quoted by Eshbach in OVER MY SHOULDER: REFLECTIONS ON A SCIENCE FICTION ERA, Donald M. Grant Publisher. 1983

Now we have a  bit of a conundrum here as if a believer were to say that Scientology is not about making cash then that person would be contradicting their ‘messiah’ and if believer were to say that Scientology was only around to make money then they would contradict their ‘religion’.

L. Ron Hubbard was lucky that he started Scientology when he did and where he did. Had he tried in any other country or time then I do not believe that Scientology would have been as successful as it is today. The reason why I say this is because Scientology was created close to the end of the 2nd world war, in 1954, when people were shaken up by the war and started questioning their beliefs and wanting to follow something, wanting to find meaning. Another reason why it is so successful is that it was created in America, where it is easy to ‘bribe’ politians – political ‘donations’, and where they virtually no privacy laws – you can find dirt on anyone quite easily and then blackmail them if they do not  pass a law etc..

Do I feel sorry for people that join this organization? Well for those who are born into Scientology then I do, but for those who decide to join them then I do not as there is enough information on the Internet to find out what they are really like.

I don’t really want to get into what I really think of Scientology because they are just too powerful, but I do believe that the more information on the Internet about them so that people can form their own opinions about them the better it is. If this is in fact the one true religion then it should welcome people who are against them as truth is only truth if it can stand up to opposition. But unfortunately they’re are not of the same belief and will do anything to try  keep their religion stain free. Unfortunately for them  this is also a reason why people are becoming vocal in their opposition against them.

Top Gear or Top Geraniums?

What is happening with trying to feminize everything now-a-days? Dr Louise Livesey is a complete moron if she believes that by trying to change such a brilliant show to become more feminine she will win any respect from the everyday laymen or from her peers. What is she thinking?

Basically the Equality Bill was passed in the UK which encourages employers to take action to widen diversity in the public sector.

Top Gear, as do a number of other programs,  falls under this Bill as it is owned by the BBC – a publicly owned entity.

So it appears that Drrr Louise Livesey, a tutor in sociology and women’s studies at Ruskin College in Oxford, thought that this would be a good opportunity to jump on the ‘sexist bandwagon’ and said of the show that it was “entrenched with institutional sexism”.

Ahem.. I am sure we would all agree that most of the programs on TV are focused towards the fairer of the sexes, and if you feel different then I would like to propose a challenge by asking you to get today’s, or any days, television program and have a look.

It was claimed that, not only are the 3 hosts all male, the show had a ‘boys club’ production team and more male guests than female.

Andy Wilwan, Top Gear’s executive producer claimed that it was “utter drivel that the show excluded women, and asked if it was geared so harshly towards men then why is the audience almost half women?”

He continues by saying, “Secondly, if we are to have a female presenter just to represent the sexes, then by that logic Loose Women needs a bloke in the line-up pretty sharpish.”

“I actually believe these sorts of mandates are patronising to women viewers, because they assume that women can’t enjoy a show’s presenters on merit, but can only appreciate a program if spoken to by one of their own sex.”

If Top Gear is change then I know for sure that it will lose a majority of the viewers. Not just the male viewers but the female as people love the show as it is.

ChatClick here to chat!+