Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Search in comments
Search in excerpt
Search in posts
Search in pages
Search in groups
Search in users
Search in forums
Filter by Categories
All Blogs
Antidote
Dick of the Week!
Entertainment & Celebs
Featured
Headline
In The News
PYWSIH
The Moron's of Judge Judy
Video
World
What a Moron! – Wendy Moore – Judge Judy

Sorry guys, looks like CBS has ordered YouTube to remove the video. I will see if I can find another copy soon.

Wendy Moore – one sad sack of a woman.

The story goes like this. Derrick Moore, Moore’s son, was listening to music in his mom’s car with his friend Perry-Anne when they decided to take the car for a drive. So they took the car to Perry-Anne’s friend down the road and on the way back they had a terrible car accident and Perry-Anne was killed. She was only 16.

Now a normal mother in that situation would be extremely sorrowful especially as she allowed the children to be in the car with the keys and in fact allows her son to drive the car on her property even though he is not qualified. But instead of this normal reaction she instead decided to sue Perry-Anne’s mother for the cost of the car and for Derrick’s medical expenses!!

Maybe I missed something, perhaps I’m not worldly wise or maybe I’m a little harsh in my thoughts, if so please forgive me when i say that surely this woman is one cold hearted, self centered biatch!! I bet a thought crossed her mind to report the car stolen so she could get an insurance payout but then backtracked as her son was also in the car.

Whatever her reasoning the fact remains that she gave the method for the teenagers to drive the car knowing that she allows her son to drive it and left the keys in the ignition.

Watch the video and let me know what you think!

What I know about Wendy Moore
Full Name Wendy Moore
Job National Guard Administrator

  1. Derrick has no hope of being a normal person with a role model like his mom ! She needs a bus to hit her quick before she breeds again !

  2. I feel sick to the stomach. I hate people who value things over the life of a person!!!!!! I bet she is a type of person that hopes her parents would die just 4 the inheretamce money

  3. she should be ashamed of herself! thx for the posting

  4. I understand why she is suing as Perry-Anne shouldn't have taken the car. But the son was also invoved and was part of the desion to take it as he was allowed to in the past. But the defendant lost her daughter and all Wendy lost was her car and a little bit of money for the medical. So would she be happier had she lost her son? Wicked witch!!

  5. Stoney faced b1tch. Karma got her in the end as millions now know what sort of person she is

  6. a total C U Next Tuesday!

  7. I'm amazed that the defendant didn't sue Wendy for giving her daughter the means of taking the car. I think should could have legally! But I'm guessing that she is not hell bent on making a quick buck from her poor daughter's death like the plaintiff. What a horrible person indeed and I feel sorry for her son that he is related to such a souless person!!!!!!

  8. What a fat bitch!

  9. I saw bits and pieces of that episode. Yes, she is a sick puppy!

  10. horrible what that stupid pink hippo said at the end – 'Perryann died because she made some stupid mistakes'. For gods sake! OWNED at the end though as now has to pay the defendant $5000!! HA

  11. Cheer up. It WILL get better.

  12. that wendy moore is a ruthless, vicious, souless, heartless, pompous, bitchy, fat cunt!!!! i hope she burns in hell and the same goes for her mcdonalds burger king stuffing son of hers… even thou perry anne drove the car w/o a license on her own free will which she shouldn't have done it's not that big of a deal. perry anne's mother should've sued them instead of being the defendant. derrick is going to become just like his mother i can already see it she should be ashamed of herself. the least wendy moore could do is yeah say she's sorry and that she feels terrible about what happened, instead of that she sues perry anne's mother for her son's medical bills and car damages like wtf! she and her son are not taking responsiblilty even thou they know that they're responsible for perry anne's death. this case is so sad i have a lot of pity for those two. my heart goes out to perry anne's mother =)

  13. Great post!

  14. Here's the vid:

  15. Nina said on May 27, 2012

    Also when you opt to appear on a judge show the maximum amount you can receive is $5000 so she did get the maximum amount possible.

  16. TJ said on March 1, 2013

    satan is angelic compared to this thing!!! uggh she needs a vial of opium -stat, no give her an overdose

  17. JJ said on May 14, 2013

    shes a disgusting example of humanity. shes lucky not to have charges pressed against her for negligence let alone sue this poor lady.

  18. Interestingly enough. This case falls under
    fruit of the forbidden tree. The fruit was the
    death caused by the theft of the car.
    The means are of no matter.
    If you leave the key to your house
    In the lock. It does not grant everyone access
    to the house or the pool or whatever. If there
    Is a death in the house by any account .
    The crime offender is held responsible.
    IE The girl who died was driving the car she
    Had no permission to drive.
    Theft.
    The boy involved is of no consequence in
    The rules of law.
    Actually the owner of the car and the son could
    Sue for reckless endangerment .
    This is an easy case on appeal.
    Don't weep or hand out emotion for stupidity.

    • It's their word against a deceased person as to whether or not permission was give and how is it a theft if she was riding with the son, who co signed on approval to access to the vehicle. (Access which was approved by Mother).

    • Her death was fruit of the forbidden tree? What are you talking about? Don't use terms you don't understand. – Sincerely, An actual lawyer

  19. I totally agree with the plantiff on this case, and here's why: the defendants daughter took it upon her self to take the car and drive it. Probably trying to whore around or something. I know I wouldn't be held liable if I were in a situation like this, and because Perry Anne drove the car without permission, her mother should pay for the damages come on now you guys are thinking emotionally. Perry Anne was totally at fault. She was 16. The boy was 14.. she should be deemed responsible for her behavior and actions, dead or not

    • Tonya must be related to the plaintiff. First off you lose any credibility when you assume the daughter was going to "whore around." What a disgusting comment. Definitely not worth trying to debate this issue with the likes of someone like you. Obvious trolling

    • actually, the woman, by means of her son, gave the girl permission to drive the car and should be held liable, as would you in such a circumstance. she made a bad judgement call and decided that her 14 yr old was old enough to have access to the vehicle. he, in turn, gave permission to the girl…even he testified that since he was able to drive he didn't think it would be a problem for the girl to drive. but for that fact, that girl wouldn't have thought about driving that car. he said it was okay for her because his mom said it was okay for him…that is a logical conclusion especially considering that these were 2 teenagers. if he wasn't old enough to know better, then (guess what?) he shouldn't have been given permission to get behind the wheel…that's why people have to go through a legal route to obtain permission to drive from their local government, and not from their parents. the insurance falls on the driven car (and the owner of that driven car)…so if there was an outstanding deductible then perhaps she could have sued for the deductible, but not his medical bills.
      and, emotionally speaking, that woman is one cold sociopath.

    • Do we know for certain that the deceased girl drove the car without permission? We could only relate to what the Wendy Moore person said. For all we know, since she is willing to let her 14 yr old drive the car on the property, she may (or may not) have told the girl to "go ahead and" drive the car and is now changing her story because the girl ended up dead. We will never know because the deceased cannot confirm this anymore. We cannot confirm that the girl died in the driver's seat of the car. If these people have 7 acres of property, they may be in a financial position to "get things done" which could include doctored police reports. We don't know the extent of the relationship between the boy and the girl at the time. For all we know, he may have been trying to impress her and decided to take the car out and then let her drive, just to show off to her. We will never know. At the end of the day, someone lost their life due to a series of bad decisions and we can debate all day to whom they belong but one thing is clear: Wendy Moore allows her 14 yr old to drive when he is not supposed to and based on that, she is culpable in this situation. Everything else is substantial and hearsay.

    • Fu_king idiot

    • Wow, you seem to be the same ghetto trash that spawns these types of suits. Well done, tonya. <sic> Since you don't know what capital letters in names are.

    • Damn, you're are big a sociopath as that mother!!

    • Wow Tony a your a fucking heartless cunt

    • Grow up you inconsiderate heartless excuse for a woman

    • Even though the mother did not verbally give Perry Anne permission to drive the car. She is liable because 1. She admitted that she lets her son drive all the time on their property. Her son is not even old enough to drive, so he should not be allowed to even touch the damn keys to the car. 2. Her son gave the girl permission to drive. and since he had permission from his mother, he became liable for whatever happened the moment he allowed that girl to drive. Since he is a minor, that makes the mother responsible for his actions.

    • Tonya, you are not at fault for your comment here. First of all, in rural areas, if a family has private property then the child is allowed to drive on it with parental consent. Often times, children help around with farming and agricultural things and need access to vehicles (whether it be cars, tractors, etc) to get their tasks done. It is not against the law so YES, this young man was allowed to be in that drivers seat. Secondly, the mother didn't give her permission to drive the car. She made one heartless comment (that I heard). Keys are easily accessible whether they're in the car or on a hook. My parents left their car keys on a hook all the time when I was 14, not once did I attempt to take their car out with little boy I might've had a thing for. Now yes, it is very unfortunate that Perri-Anne died but the drive of a vehicle in a one car accident is 100% responsible for their actions and in this case, it netted her mother an unpleasant courtroom visit and funeral. This is reality guys, think with logic and not emotions.

    • Now you know how to think like a lawyer. You would def win a case with that. But that won't apply because she recklessly and with neglect left her keys in the car. That makes her liable for the death.

    • You are a moron too

    • After what her son is now jailed for the attempted murder of a young woman, I'm not 100% sure that a. Perianne was driving, or b. He could have caused the accident by trying to assault her.
      Lastly c. You too are a moron, maybe you should join derrick. There was nothing that suggested Perianne was 'trying to whore around'

  20. irritating!

  21. I understand she did it in the sense she wants money.

    But from a moral and ethical standpoint, this is one of the most appalling things I've seen…. fucking awful.

    I'm glad it backfired. I'd have made her pay the mother a six figure sum for the pain and suffering of a non justified law suit.

  22. Heartless is an understatement

  23. I read a lot of interesting content here. Probably you
    spend a lot of time writing, i know how to save you a lot of time, there is an online tool that creates high
    quality, google friendly articles in minutes, just search in google – laranitas
    free content source

  24. plaintiff created an "attractive nuisance" and was negligent by leaving keys in car. Judge Judy should have dismissed the counter-claim without prejudice so the defendant could go to another court other than small claims and REALLY sock it to the defendant for BIG coin.

    • I sadly disagree. You forgot the fact that the claim was directed at the claim of pain and suffering resulting in death. She died. She deserves the maximum amount possible because if she cannot get her daughter back, she will get money for funeral, tombstones, memoriums, EVERYTHING SHE DESERVES in her honor.

  25. Whether it was the girls "fault" or not, she is not here to defend herself, where-as this boy is. this woman still has her son, she should be grateful that he is still alive, not suing for damages to the car and medical bills which she can obviously afford with seven acres of land! this woman just lost her sixteen year old daughter because Moore was negligent and gave the kids means to drive the car, her son even said they did it all the time so he didn't see an issue with it! my brother just passed away because of some bitch who couldn't keep her hands on the wheel, and I'm telling you, if her mother ever said anything like that to mine it would end up in a full on beat down. Moore is lucky I wasn't there because judge Judy would have to put me in jail! Moore would be surprised to know how much a funeral costs. a lot more than a little car and some medical bills, that's for sure. and that's not even getting started on the loss of life! ugly pig. I hope she never has to feel that type of loss!

  26. Wendy moore fits the exact description of song ….mr grinch!!!

  27. That women (thing) will never know a days peace in her revolting life people like that don't deserve to walk amongst good people she just didn't give a damn about Perry or her family it's scary that people like that exist she's an abomination evil

  28. Fukin eejit of a wummen me thinks she hasn't got a brain mumbled the whole way through the case and her fat fozey ugly son he's her boy alright fukin abominations

  29. I cannot believe there are people roaming this earth that are inhuman. Justice will be served when it is her time to go. Its hard not to judge a person like that. She is also teaching her son the same behavior. No morals, no values, no compassion. She is a vile human being and as said in above comments, karma got her in the end, and it will continue. Awful, vile human being.

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

ChatClick here to chat!+